X also changes his words, files against them to write the sign of ‘Twitter’ after a new challenge

Elon Musk’s X is changing its Terms of Service to indicate that it still wants the “Twitter” logo. A move to extend this to the company’s products follows to announce from a startup in Virginia, where they recently filed an application for the name “Twitter.”

The founders, Operation Bluebird, say X ditched the “Twitter” brand by rebranding its social network “X.” In its application to the US Patent and Trademark Office, which was filed on December 2, the inventor pointed to a statement written by X Musk on July 23, 2023, who announced that the social network “will bid adieu to the twitter brand.”

X is now contesting the claim with a countersuit his own. In the new listing, X is said to continue to feature the Twitter and Tweet logo and the bluebird logo.

Starting to explain it request to stop it, Operation Bluebird has been gathering people to sign up for its website on a site called Twitter.new. The effort is approaching and two lawyers, including the founder Michael Peroff, in Illinois, and Stephen Coateshe was previously a marketing attorney at Twitter. Considering how they got started, their claim that they want to start a new career for X seems questionable. It is possible that they want to find a brand, which has its own value.

However, X is not taking his chances. It has been updated Terms of Serviceeffective January 15, 2026, states:

“Nothing in the Terms grants you the right to use the X name or the Twitter name or any of the X or Twitter trademarks, logos, brand names, other distinctive features, and other proprietary rights, and you may not do so without our express written consent.”

Previously, this term was simply referred to as X in this section. No mention of Twitter.

This statement includes other, minor changes, including references to EU law and its provisions. X’s Privacy Policy has also been updated with several references to age verification technology.

It has been replaced with a link that contradicts what was originally published.