Indian scientists predict how bird flu could spread to humans

For years, scientists have warned that avian influenza, better known as H5N1, could one day jump dangerously from birds to humans and trigger a global health crisis.

Avian influenza is a type of influenza that is deeply entrenched in South and Southeast Asia and has occasionally infected humans since it emerged in China in the late 1990s. From 2003 to August 2025, the World Health Organization (WHO) has report There were 990 human cases of H5N1 in 25 countries, including 475 deaths, a mortality rate of 48%.

In the United States alone, the virus has infected more than 180 million poultry, spread to more than 1,000 dairy herds in 18 states, and infected at least 70 people, mostly farm workers, resulting in multiple hospitalizations and one death. In January, three tigers and a leopard died at a wildlife rescue center in the Indian city of Nagpur from a virus that commonly affects birds.

Symptoms in humans are similar to those of severe influenza: high fever, cough, sore throat, muscle aches, and sometimes conjunctivitis. Some people have no symptoms at all. The risk from H5N1 to humans remains low, but authorities are watching closely for any changes in H5N1 that might make it more likely to spread.

This concern prompted Indian researchers Philip Cherian and Gautam Menon of Ashoka University to build a new peer-reviewed model that simulates how an H5N1 outbreak might break out in humans and what early interventions could stop it before it spreads.

in other words, Model The study, published in the journal BMC Public Health, used real-world data and computer simulations to show how the outbreak would spread in real life.

Professor Menon told the BBC: “The threat to humanity from the H5N1 influenza pandemic is real, but we hope to prevent it through better surveillance and a more flexible public health response.”

Researchers say an avian flu pandemic will start quietly: an infected bird transmits the virus to a human – most likely a farmer, market worker or someone handling poultry. From that point on, the danger lies not in the first infection but in what happens next: ongoing human-to-human transmission.

With real outbreaks starting with limited and confusing data, researchers turn to Bharat Siman open source simulation platform originally built for modeling Covid 19, but is versatile enough to study other diseases.

The main takeaway for policymakers, researchers say, is how narrow the window for action can be before an outbreak gets out of control.

The paper estimates that once the number of cases increases to about 2 to 10, the disease may spread beyond primary and secondary contacts.

A primary contact is someone who has had direct, close contact with an infected person, such as a family member, caregiver, or close co-worker. Secondary contacts are people who have not met an infected person but have been in close contact with a primary contact.

The study found that if households with primary contacts were quarantined when just two cases were detected, the outbreak could almost certainly be contained.

But by the time 10 cases are discovered, the infection has most likely already spread to the wider population, making its trajectory little different from what it would have been without early intervention.

To ground the study in realistic conditions, the researchers chose a model of a village in Namakkal district of Tamil Nadu, the heart of India’s poultry belt.

Namakkal has more than 1,600 poultry farms and about 70 million chickens; it produces more than 60 million eggs every day.

A village of 9,667 residents was generated using integrated communities (households, workplaces, market spaces) and seeded with infected birds to mimic real-life exposures. (Synthetic communities are artificial, computer-generated groups that mimic the characteristics and behavior of real groups.)

In the simulation, the virus starts in a workplace (a medium-sized farm or wet market), spreads first to people there (primary contacts), and then spreads outward to other people they come into contact with through their homes, schools, and other workplaces (secondary contacts). Families, schools and workplaces form a fixed network.

By tracking primary and secondary infections, the researchers estimated key transmission indicators, including the basic infection number, R0, which measures the average number of people an infected person spreads the virus to. The researchers simulated a range of reasonable transmission speeds in the absence of a real-world pandemic.

They then tested what happened when different interventions—culling birds, quarantining close contacts, and targeted vaccinations—started.

The results are straightforward.

Culling birds is effective—but only before the virus infects humans.

The researchers found that if a spillover does occur, timing becomes critical.

Isolating infected people and quarantining households can stop the virus in the second phase. But once level 3 infection emerges — a friend of a friend or a contact of a contact — the epidemic can spiral out of control unless authorities take tougher measures, including lockdowns.

Targeted vaccination can help raise the threshold at which the virus becomes self-sustaining, although it does little to change the immediate risk within households.

The simulations also highlighted an awkward trade-off.

Quarantine imposed too early can keep families together for extended periods of time and increase the chances of an infected person passing the virus to those they live with. It was introduced too late to do anything to slow the outbreak.

The researchers say this approach comes with some caveats.

The model relies on a synthetic village with fixed household sizes, workplaces, and daily activity patterns. It does not include simultaneous outbreaks spread by migratory birds or poultry networks. It also fails to explain changes in behavior (such as wearing masks) once people know a bird is about to die.

The simulation model “assumes that influenza viruses spread very efficiently,” adds Seema Lakdawala, a virologist at Emory University in Atlanta.

“Transmission is complex, and not every strain of the virus is as efficient as another,” she said, adding that scientists are also now starting to understand that not everyone who gets seasonal flu spreads the virus equally.

New research suggests that only “a subset of flu-positive individuals actually spread infectious flu virus into the air,” she said.

This reflects super spreader phenomenon As with Covid-19, although it’s far less well characterized for influenza – a gap that could strongly influence how the virus spreads through the population.

What would happen if H5N1 succeeded in humans?

Dr Lakdawala believes this “will cause greater damage, probably more akin to 2009 (swine flu) pandemic rather than Covid-19″.

“This is because we are better prepared for an influenza pandemic. We already know licensed antiviral drugs that are effective against the H5N1 strain as an early defense and have stockpiled drug candidates H5 vaccine Can be deployed in short order. “

But complacency would be a mistake. If H5N1 takes hold in humans, it could recombine or mix with existing strains, expanding its public health impact, Dr. Lakdawala said. This mix could reshape seasonal flu, causing “chaotic and unpredictable seasonal epidemics.”

Indian modellers say the simulations can run in real time and update as data comes in.

With improvements — better delays in reporting, asymptomatic cases — they could provide public health officials with something priceless early in an outbreak: knowing which actions are most important before the containment window closes.

Follow BBC India News Instagram, Youtube, X and Facebook.