Blake Lively attends the 2026 Met Gala, Ryan Reynolds is absent

Blake Lively go out 2026 Metropolitan Museum of Art Charity Dinner Just between her and Justin Baldoni A settlement was reached in the lawsuit, which means the case will not go to trial.

this gossip Girl The 38-year-old alum donned an “Art of Costume” themed outfit at an event held at the Metropolitan Museum of Art in New York City on Monday, May 4. She chose to wear a subtle Atelier Versace dress with a draped bodice embroidered with gemstones in pastel pink, yellow, coral, peach and lilac. The dress also included a long train, which was seen as she walked up the stairs at the venue.

Lively accessorized the look with a custom Judith Leiber Couture bag featuring colorful artwork made by her four children.

She walked the red carpet alone. As a husband, Ryan Reynolds, The activity appears to be skipped.

Lively has been a standout at the Met Gala since her debut in 2008 on fashion’s biggest night. Reynolds, who married in September 2012, notably joined her at the glamorous event in 2014, their first red carpet appearance as a couple. Lively, who has set the style standard for Met Gala fashion statements for years, had been absent from the annual fundraiser since 2023 until returning this year.

Lively attended the 2026 party exactly two weeks ago The trial of BaldoniThe 42-year-old’s case was originally scheduled to begin on May 18. However, it was confirmed that Lively and Baldoni had settled the case just hours before Lively and Reynolds hit the Met Gala red carpet.

“The final product – the movie It all ends with us – a source of pride for all of us who worked hard to make it a reality. Raising awareness and making a meaningful impact on the lives of domestic violence survivors and all survivors are goals we support,” Lively and Baldoni said in a statement. US Weekly May 4 through their attorneys. “We acknowledge that this process presents challenges and recognize that the concerns raised by Ms. Lively deserve to be heard.”

The statement continued: “We remain deeply committed to a workplace free of inappropriate behavior and a low-productivity environment. We sincerely hope that this can come to an end and that all involved can move forward constructively and peacefully, including creating a respectful online environment.”

In December 2024, Lively sued her It all ends with us Co-star and director Baldoni is accused of sexual harassment, retaliation, breach of contract, infliction of emotional distress, invasion of privacy and lost wages. Baldoni denied the allegations and countersued Lively in January 2025, although his case was ultimately dismissed in June of that year.

Shortly before Lively and Baldoni were scheduled to appear in court on her charges, a federal judge Lewis Leaman Denies 10 of Lively’s 13 claims from her April lawsuit. Her harassment, defamation and conspiracy charges were dismissed, while her breach of contract, retaliation and aiding and abetting retaliation charges were allowed to proceed to trial.

then, Baldoni’s lawyer Brian Friedman TMZ said in a statement that it was “relieved” to see the court’s ruling “confirming what the legal team has believed since day one” that Baldoni and his co-defendants “did not engage in the alleged sexual harassment.”

Meanwhile, Lively’s attorney Michael Gottlieb said in a statement us “It’s completely unsurprising that Brian Friedman doesn’t understand what the court actually ruled.”

“The court’s de facto ruling yesterday was that Blake Lively presented evidence to stand trial on her central claim: that she spoke out on set against what she perceived to be sexual harassment and suffered retaliation that damaged her reputation as a result,” Gottlieb continued. “The court’s finding that Ms. Lively’s state and federal harassment claims were incompetent to stand trial was a question of law, not an endorsement of the defendant’s conduct.”

Gottlieb added, “The court finds that Ms. Lively’s sexual harassment claims cannot be presented to a jury because Ms. Lively did not sign a contract, she was an independent contractor rather than an employee, and the assault occurred in New Jersey rather than California.”

To her, lively, Talking about the judge’s decision via her Instagram Story at the time.

She wrote: “I am grateful for the court’s ruling that allows the core elements of my case to be presented to a jury next month, and grateful that I will finally be able to tell my full story at trial, both for myself and for those who do not have the same opportunity…many of whom I have known and loved deeply throughout my life, and countless others who I will never know.” “The last thing I want in my life is a lawsuit, but I am filing this lawsuit because I have faced widespread retaliation and continue to privately and professionally demand a safe work environment for myself and others.”

Lively added that she would “never stop” doing her part to “expose the systems and people who seek to harm, shame, silence and retaliate against victims.”

“I know it’s a privilege to be able to stand up. I’m not going to waste it,” she concluded. “Your support keeps me going.”