OpenAI’s vision for the AI ​​economy: human capital, robot taxes, and the four-day work week.

As governments grapple with how to manage the economic fallout of artificial intelligence, OpenAI has released a group of policy recommendations describing the ways in which the economy and jobs can be transformed in the “smart era.” These proposals include left-leaning measures such as social capital funding and increasing social security through market-driven economic measures.

OpenAI’s vision is essentially a wish list, a public announcement that helps voters, investors, and the public understand how the $852 billion company sees the world changing in an age where artificial intelligence is changing jobs and the economy.

The proposal was released during the expansion concerns around AIwhich has been replaced by anxiety dismissalsavings, and data center infrastructure the whole world. They have also reached the point where the Trump administration is going to a National AI framework and in preparation for the mid-term elections, which shows that people will try to have two sides. This effort is beside the point of direct politics: OpenAI President Greg Brockman – who has said gave millions to President Donald Trump — and other tech billionaires have done well hundreds of millions into super PACs support for lightweight AI principles.

OpenAI’s goals focus on three stated goals: to distribute AI-driven development more widely, to build security to reduce systemic risk, and to ensure that AI’s potential is widespread so that economic power and opportunity are not limited.

OpenAI has decided to shift taxes from labor to capital. The company stops reporting on the corporate tax rate – which Trump lowered to 21% from 35% during his first term. But OpenAI warns that AI-driven growth could disrupt the tax system that supports Social Security, Medicaid, SNAP, and housing assistance as corporate profits grow and depend on labor costs.

“As AI redefines work and production, the economic landscape will change – increasing business profits and profits while reducing dependence on labor costs and taxes,” wrote OpenAI.

The company suggests higher corporate taxes, AI-driven returns, or higher profits at the top – a group of policies that pushed Marc Andreessen to back Trump after Biden proposed a tax that didn’t happen in 2024. Bill Gates proposed in 2017which involved the robot paying the same tax in the system as the person who replaced him.

The document also includes a proposal to create a Public Wealth Fund to give Americans an exclusive stake in AI companies and AI infrastructure, even if they are not sold on the market. Any refunds can be distributed directly to citizens. The prospect may appeal to Americans who have watched AI expand the market without seeing any of those gains.

Several of OpenAI’s proposals were also about jobs, including one to fund four days of unpaid work — an idea that echoes tech companies’ promises that AI will give people a better working life. OpenAI also shows that companies promote retirement matches or donations, pay large amounts of medical expenses, and provide financial support for children or the elderly. In particular, OpenAI puts this as the responsibility of companies rather than the government, leaving people who AI can displace. If a machine takes your job away, employer-sponsored health care and retirement matches can go with it.

That said, OpenAI does create separate mobile accounts that track workers across the board, but this still relies on employers or platform offerings and leaves out any government-controlled coverage that would prevent people from being completely excluded from AI.

OpenAI acknowledges that the risks of AI go beyond the loss of functionality, including misuse by governments or criminals and the potential for systems operating beyond the limits of society. To reduce these threats, it offers plans with dangerous AI, new regulatory agencies, and security that should be used for high-risk situations such as cyberattacks and biological threats.

But with safety nets and safeguards come growing ideas, including expanding infrastructure to support AI’s powerful demands and accelerating AI infrastructure through grants, tax credits, or demonstrations. OpenAI says that AI should be seen as a service, and to that end, it suggests that industry and government work together to ensure that AI remains affordable and widely available, rather than controlled by a few companies.

The OpenAI process comes six months after the competition Anthropic released its policy framework, which provided several possible solutions to AI-driven disruption.

“We are entering a new economic and social phase that will revolutionize work, knowledge, and production,” OpenAI wrote. This, the company says, calls for “a new corporate strategy that ensures that high-tech benefits everyone.”

OpenAI was founded as a non-profit organization dedicated to AI for the benefit of the public. It became a profit-making company last year, a change that has led critics to question whether its stated mission is consistent with its need to grow and fulfill its fiduciary duty to shareholders.

The company referred to the previous years of economic crisis as the Industrial Age, and pointed out how new economic and financial movements like the New Deal helped “growth translate into greater opportunity and greater security” by building new government institutions, security, and expectations of what a fair economy should provide, including worker protection, safety standards, social safety nets, and expanding access to education.

“The transition to intelligent governance will also require a more robust industrial approach, one that demonstrates the ability of democratic societies to act collectively, at scale, to shape their economic futures so that advanced intelligence benefits everyone,” writes OpenAI.