t>

Swissquote SPX — TradingView


Although the Federal Reserve lowered the federal funds rate to 3.75% and launched a technical quantitative easing program after ending quantitative tightening (QT), January 2026 will be directly affected by the monetary impact of Donald Trump’s decision on Jerome Powell’s successor, who will take office in May 2026.

The US president is expected to announce his selection early next year, with the latest consensus figures suggesting the decision will be made by Kevin Hassett and Kevin Wash. The Fed has adopted a more accommodative path, re-expanding its balance sheet in a very limited way (by purchasing short-term bonds to ensure the smooth functioning of monetary and interbank markets), but the next interest rate cycle remains uncertain and will depend on US labor market data (NFP report) and inflation data to be released in January and February (PCE and CPI index).

But it must be recognized that markets will also be strongly influenced by the so-called “shadow Fed chairman” who will be appointed in January and officially take office in the spring.

Which of Kevin Hassett or Kevin Worsh is considered more dovish in terms of monetary policy outlook?

Snapshot

Today, from a market perspective, Kevin Hassett becomes the most “loose” candidate. He is a growth-focused economist who is sensitive to the impact of financial conditions on investment, labor markets and asset valuations. Historically, Hassett has argued that monetary policy should remain flexible and pragmatic, even if that means inflation continues to be slightly above target, to avoid excessive tightening of financial conditions. His approach is seen as supporting a continued easing trend, or at least a very slow normalization of real interest rates, in the current context of rising public debt and growing market reliance on global liquidity.

In contrast, Kevin Wash embodies a more traditional and disciplined approach to criticism. As a former Fed governor, he has repeatedly expressed reservations about extending unconventional policies, believing that large-scale quantitative easing has led to serious distortions in financial markets and capital misallocation. While aware of current systemic constraints, Warsh may be inclined to limit the Fed’s balance sheet expansion and prioritize the credibility of fighting inflation, even if doing so increases stock market volatility.
Snapshot

The difference between these two scenarios is therefore critical to the future trajectory of risky assets. Kevin Hassett’s selection would reinforce the Fed’s “market-friendly” assumption of maintaining favorable liquidity conditions and implicitly supporting valuation multiples, particularly in the S&P 500. The appointment of Kevin Warsh will introduce a more hawkish bias in the medium term and bring the risk of a reassessment of price expectations

Disclaimer:

This content is intended for individuals familiar with financial markets and instruments and is for informational purposes only. The ideas presented (including market commentary, market data and observations) are not the work of any research department of Swissquote or its affiliates. This material is intended to highlight market trends and does not constitute investment, legal or tax advice. If you are a retail investor or lack experience in trading complex financial products, it is recommended that you seek professional advice from a licensed advisor before making any financial decisions.

The content is not intended to manipulate markets or encourage any specific financial behavior.
Swissquote makes no representations or warranties regarding the quality, completeness, accuracy, comprehensiveness or non-infringement of such content. The opinions expressed are those of the advisor and are for educational purposes only. Any product or market-related information provided should not be construed as advice on investment strategies or trading. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.
In no event shall Swissquote, its employees and representatives be liable for any damages or losses arising directly or indirectly from decisions based on this content.
The use of any trademark or third-party trademark is for reference only and does not imply endorsement by Swissquote Bank or that the trademark owner authorizes Swissquote Bank to promote its products or services.
Swissquote is a subsidiary of Swissquote Bank Ltd (Switzerland) regulated by the Swiss Securities Regulatory Authority (FINMA), Swissquote Capital Markets Limited regulated by the Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission (Cyprus), Swissquote Bank Europe SA (Luxembourg) regulated by the Cyprus Financial Supervisory Authority, Swissquote Ltd (UK) regulated by the Cyprus Financial Supervisory Authority, Swissquote Financial Services (Malta) Limited Event Marketing Brands of the Malta Financial Services Authority, Swissquote MEA Ltd. (United Arab Emirates) regulated by the Dubai Financial Services Authority, Swissquote Pte Ltd (Singapore) regulated by the Monetary Authority of Singapore, Swissquote Asia Limited (Hong Kong) regulated by the Hong Kong Securities and Futures Authority and Swissquote South Africa Limited (Pty) regulated by the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Swissquote products and services are available only to persons permitted to receive them by local law.
All investing involves some degree of risk. The risk of loss from trading or holding financial instruments can be substantial. The value of financial instruments (including, but not limited to, stocks, bonds, cryptocurrencies and other assets) may fluctuate up and down. There is a significant risk of financial loss when buying, selling, holding, betting or investing in these financial instruments. SQBE does not make any recommendation regarding any specific investment or transaction or the use of any specific investment strategy.
CFDs are complex instruments and carry a high risk of losing money quickly due to leverage. The vast majority of retail client accounts will suffer capital losses when trading CFDs. You should consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.
Digital assets are unregulated in most countries, and consumer protection rules may not apply to them. As a speculative investment with high volatility, digital assets are not suitable for investors who cannot bear high risks. Before trading, make sure you understand each digital asset.

Cryptocurrencies are not considered legal tender in some jurisdictions and are subject to regulatory uncertainty.

The use of Internet-based systems may involve high risks, including but not limited to fraud, cyberattacks, network and communications failures, and identity theft and phishing attacks related to digital assets.



Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *